Search

Father disputes report into care of student, 19, who died after anorexia fight

PUBLISHED: 21:07 29 June 2018 | UPDATED: 21:50 29 June 2018

Averil Hart, who died in 2012 after suffering from anorexia nervosa. Picture: SUPPLIED BY FAMILY

Averil Hart, who died in 2012 after suffering from anorexia nervosa. Picture: SUPPLIED BY FAMILY

Archant

The father of a 19-year-old Suffolk student who suffered with anorexia has revealed he is refusing to accept a new report which found lessons had been learned from her death.

Averil Hart. Photo: HART FAMILYAveril Hart. Photo: HART FAMILY

Averil Hart, from Sudbury, was just 10 weeks into her first term at the University of East Anglia when she collapsed in her flat on December 7, 2012.

The former Colchester High School for Girls pupil was rushed to Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH) with a dangerously low temperature, blood sugar and blood pressure – but it was three days before medics realised the seriousness of her illness.

Doctors transferred her to Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge on December 11 – but she was not seen for five hours.

She died on December 15, suffering a heart attack and brain damage from the low blood sugar.

Averil was just 19 when she died. Picture: SUPPLIED BY FAMILYAveril was just 19 when she died. Picture: SUPPLIED BY FAMILY

An investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) last year found every single NHS organisation involved in her care failed her.

At the time ombudsman Rob Behrens CBE wrote: “The NHS must learn from these events, for the sake of future patients.”

Now, a report from the Norfolk Safeguarding Adults Board (NSAB) claims those lessons have been learned.

But Nic Hart, Averil’s father who has led a passionate campaign for justice, said he did not accept the findings.

Mr Hart, from Sudbury, said: “These are the same people who told me Averil’s care was satisfactory in the first place.”

And he struggled to see how one review in November 2017 had found no progress, but just 20 weeks later a second review said there had been headway made.

Commissioners said this was because in November the PHSO investigation was ongoing so they could not provide evidence of improvements to the NSAB.

But Mr Hart said: “There was five years with no change to November 2017 and then 20 weeks later, is it really better?”

He said through his campaign to hold organisations to account, he was still being contacted by others who were struggling to access help and whose family members had died.

He said: “My sense is that pressure has been brought to bear for people to do the paperwork, but nothing much is changing on the ground.”

Mr Hart said the family was now waiting for an inquest date, where they hoped for more answers.

What NHS bosses said

All of the organisations involved in Averil’s care previously said they had taken into account lessons from the tragedy.

At the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital a spokesman said the hospital’s nutrition team had expanded and included three consultant staff, while across the trust there was better recognition of eating disorders.

At Cambridge and Peterborough Foundation Trust – which runs the Norfolk Community Eating Disorder Service – chief executive Tracy Dowling previously said they had implemented new guidelines and processes for managing high-risk patients.

Addenbroke’s Hospital said “lessons have been learned and changes made”.

North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group also said changes had been made and reiterated their “sincere apologies”.

UEA Medical Centre previously said they would reflect on the findings of the ombudsman.

0 comments

Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files
Comments

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Sudbury Mercury visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Sudbury Mercury staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Sudbury Mercury account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Other popular content

24 minutes ago

A car was seized by police after its driver was reportedly found not to have a licence to be on the road.

31 minutes ago

A council leader has urged businesses in west Suffolk to “seize a golden opportunity” to benefit from a major investment in RAF Lakenheath.

31 minutes ago

NHS staff from EU countries account for up to a sixth of the workforce in some of the region’s key hospital roles, figures show.

34 minutes ago

The electoral shape of two new councils being set up in Suffolk from May next year have been finalised by the Boundary Commission.

Show Job Lists

Local weather

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 14°C

min temp: 10°C

Newsletter Sign Up

Sudbury Mercury weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy

MyDate24 MyPhotos24