Claims bypass will be needed to prevent Sudbury from becoming gridlocked by influx of new homeowners

PUBLISHED: 10:10 12 February 2015 | UPDATED: 10:10 12 February 2015

Council leaders meet on Sudbury's Ballingdon Hill to discuss the need for a western bypass Left to right: County  council leader Mark Bee, South Suffolk Conservative candidate James Cartlidge and cabinet member for roads, Graham Newman.

Council leaders meet on Sudbury's Ballingdon Hill to discuss the need for a western bypass Left to right: County council leader Mark Bee, South Suffolk Conservative candidate James Cartlidge and cabinet member for roads, Graham Newman.


Fears that up to 2,000 new homes on the outskirts of Sudbury could cause the town’s traffic system to grind to a halt have led to renewed calls for a bypass.

A masterplan for the 1,250 home Chilton Woods scheme was revealed earlier this month and views are also being sought on a proposal to build a further 500 on land north east of Great Cornard, just a mile away.

Serious concerns have been raised about whether Sudbury can cope with the extra traffic the expansion would bring. Because Suffolk County Council owns most of the Chilton Woods site but is also responsible for highways, local councillors are pushing for an “independent” study of the surrounding roads.

When plans for the development were first submitted around a decade ago, a bypass was not deemed necessary but many feel it is now vital to get the infrastructure in place before new homes are built.

Babergh councillor Frank Lawrenson who covers the neighbouring parishes of Acton, Chilton, and Great Waldingfield said the possibility of Sudbury “becoming gridlocked” by a massive influx of people using the roads was a major concern.

He said: “There’s a belief that the area will not cope with development on this scale without a bypass. But according to the current highways and consultants’ evidence, we don’t need it at this point.

“I don’t believe though that we can look at Chilton Woods in isolation - we need to consider the area as a whole.

“It’s about credibility and evidence and the problem is that we don’t have any of that yet.

“People need reassurance and the only way that’s going to be achieved is if the county council commissions and pays for an independent study for the public giving answers in terms that people understand.”

Town councillor Nigel Bennett agreed that the county council should carry out a study to ascertain Sudbury’s “tipping point” in terms of traffic volume. He said: “If we have reached tipping point, it would be strange to go beyond that point. We need to know what the limit is.”

His colleague Lesley Ford Platt said the bypass was “long overdue” and one of the solutions to Sudbury’s needs. Meanwhile South Suffolk Conservative candidate James Cartlidge who recently launched a campaign to get the bypass proposal back on the agenda said he had been struck by the level of support for the idea from Sudbury people.

He said: “I have also found a general impression that if Chilton Woods is built that somehow a bypass will automatically follow.

“This is not the case as there is no planning requirement for a bypass to accompany Chilton Woods.

“However, as principal landowner at Chilton Woods, legal requirements aside, Suffolk County Council will have a moral duty to continue supporting the case for a bypass because of the even greater traffic pressure that would follow.

“Fortunately, we have had some very supportive signals from the leadership at county but we now need to start seeing that turn into a concrete business case with detailed traffic surveys that can take us forward.”

According to a spokesperson for Suffolk County Council, the capacity of existing roads and junctions is currently being tested through a transport assessment as part of the planning process.

He said: “This will identify what further road improvements may be required. Some areas have been identified that will require works to ensure roads can manage additional flow.

“The delivery of a western bypass is a much wider issue and is not required to accommodate the proposed development. However, it is a long term ambition of Babergh District Council and Suffolk County Council.”


  • What nonsense! Not a single car from Chilton Woods will use the bypass (unless they're driving aimlessly round in circles). This is just another excuse for people with a bee in their bonnet about the need for a by-pass to bang on about it. More of a problem might be the need for additional schools at a time when Suffolk County Council is spending £127,000,000 knocking down perfectly good ones.

    Report this comment


    Saturday, February 14, 2015

  • It's not just about the traffic - the town doesn't have any of the infrastructure in place to deal with PEOPLE let alone more traffic! Ok so they are on about building a new primary school...that's fine but they'll eventually have to go to the existing secondary schools which are already bursting. Where are these people going to work? Any more doctors on the horizon? Getting an appointment now is a nightmare so who knows what it will be like with a few thousand more people living in the town.

    Report this comment


    Thursday, February 12, 2015

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Other popular content

14 minutes ago

David Kindred takes a look at past building sites around Ipswich before the introduction of health and safety including St Margaret’s church and Fore Street.

Police have discovered the body of a missing teenager in Lakenheath.


Walkers crisps, frozen mash, children’s shoes, and wine from John Lewis are a few of the many items which are being recalled. Check the list and make sure you don’t have these products in your home.

Chair of the board of governors at Easton and Otley College, Mark Pendlington, reflects on what will be needed to steer the college forward after its shock Ofsted rating

Show Job Lists

Local weather



max temp: 11°C

min temp: 4°C

Newsletter Sign Up

Sudbury Mercury weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy

MyDate24 MyPhotos24