Search

Concerns over loss of green land as plans for 130 homes are submitted for former Wheldon’s Orchard, Sudbury

PUBLISHED: 16:03 06 September 2017

File photo dated 07/02/17 of houses under construction on a new housing development in Basingstoke, Hampshire. The number of new-build homes being registered at the start of 2017 was the highest in a decade, according to an industry body. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Issue date: Thursday April 27, 2017. Some 42,470 new homes were registered in the first quarter of 2017, showing the strongest quarter since the third quarter of 2007 as well as a 17% increase on the same period in 2016, according to the National House Building Council (NHBC). See PA story MONEY Housebuilding. Photo credit should read: Andrew Matthews/PA Wire

File photo dated 07/02/17 of houses under construction on a new housing development in Basingstoke, Hampshire. The number of new-build homes being registered at the start of 2017 was the highest in a decade, according to an industry body. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Issue date: Thursday April 27, 2017. Some 42,470 new homes were registered in the first quarter of 2017, showing the strongest quarter since the third quarter of 2007 as well as a 17% increase on the same period in 2016, according to the National House Building Council (NHBC). See PA story MONEY Housebuilding. Photo credit should read: Andrew Matthews/PA Wire

Plans to build 130 homes in Sudbury have faced a backlash from green belt campaigners.

The outline planning application for homes on land north of Waldingfield Road, on the outskirts of the town, is the former Wheldon’s Orchard and is currently undeveloped.

The application has been made by Catesby Estates Limited and their have been concerns raised around the loss of green space, particularly in light of a planned 1,100 homes at nearby Chilton Woods.

One neighbour who commented on the planning application and objected said she had concerns over traffic.
She said: “I appreciate housing is needed, however I am concerned by the size of the proposed development.

“We have already noticed the traffic is busier since the new community health centre and The Harp Meadow development were built and there seems to be more rubbish around.

“There is also the disruption to the wildlife. I moved here because this part of Sudbury is quieter, less built up and there is currently a bit of green land to be seen. Also, I understand there is going to be a bigger development near Tesco, how many more areas of countryside are going to be used in Sudbury?”

The development, which would include a play area and 35% affordable housing, is being objected to by the Sudbury Green Belt Action Group.

Nick Miller, who founded the group, said: “It is a beautiful spot, badly needed in my view, as it is green space for the Chilton Woods development and a continuation of the cycle-path round the ‘Prolog’ field from near Chilton Church. I think it will be truly a disgrace if Babergh approve this.”

The application will go to Babergh District Council’s planning committee at a later date. Suffolk County Council’s flood risk officer has issued a holding objection, with a range of concerns over plans for drainage.

The site was initially part of the Chilton Woods development, which is now a Suffolk County Council project, however it no longer forms a part of the long-delayed plans for 1,100 homes.

The applicant cites a severe lack of housing, which has led to Babergh failing to meet housing targets, in support of their plans. The lack of an up to date local plan means local policy will largely be disregarded in favour of national planning rules.

0 comments

Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files
Comments

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Sudbury Mercury visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Sudbury Mercury staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Sudbury Mercury account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Other popular content

10:29

A body of a man has been found washed up at Felixstowe beach, police have said.

52 minutes ago

The chief executive of a Suffolk company on £170,000 a year has been banned from driving for six months with 21 penalty points for speeding after losing an ‘exceptional hardship’ plea.

08:45

A key new agreement between the Government and the Church of England could see many more churches used to boost mobile connectivity around Suffolk.

08:45

Judges at the Suffolk Owl Sanctuary (S.O.S.) at Stonham Barns had over 350 images submitted, from which just eight winners have been selected.

Show Job Lists

Local weather

Rain

Rain

max temp: 7°C

min temp: 6°C

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter
MyDate24 MyPhotos24