Search

Film review: Find out what we thought of science fiction film Flatliners

PUBLISHED: 10:22 09 October 2017 | UPDATED: 12:05 10 October 2017

Here is what we thought of Flatliners. Picture: MEGAN ALDOUS

Here is what we thought of Flatliners. Picture: MEGAN ALDOUS

Archant

For all its ropy visual effects and poorly written dialogue, Joel Schumacher’s 1990 psychological horror Flatliners had a genuine charm and sense of intrigue.

The atmosphere was generated by the strong chemistry between the central characters and its themes of religion and morality, elements that director Niels Arden Oplev’s supposed sequel is lacking.

The film focuses of a group of five medical students (Ellen Page, Diego Luna, Nina Dobrev, James Norton and Kiersey Simmons) who undergo a dangerous medical procedure in order to get a brief glimpse at the afterlife only for dark visions from their murky pasts to come back to haunt them.

The main problem which plagues the film is that, bar the presence of Kiefer Sutherland, it bears a closer resemblance to a remake than it does a sequel, often hitting many of the same beats as the first.

Indeed, so similar is this to the original that those familiar with Schumacher’s film will be able to predict where the film is heading before the halfway mark.

This would be fine were the story driven by protagonists as strongly realised as the first but, unfortunately the central characters are so thinly written that the talented cast are unable to inject any life into them.

That said, the protagonists’ journeys into the afterlife are stunningly realised and the director peppers the film with enough grisly imagery to keep audiences entertained.

Though there is enough to keep horror fans engaged this is ultimately an empty and pointless update of Schumacher’s film.

0 comments

Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files
Comments

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Sudbury Mercury visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Sudbury Mercury staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Sudbury Mercury account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Other popular content

15 minutes ago

The deadline is approaching to have your say on the state of the tourism and leisure industry in East Anglia.

00:01

The number of reported sex offences against children has risen in Suffolk and Essex, new figures have revealed.

Yesterday, 23:31

A man who evaded nearly £300,000 in tax importing a shipping container loaded with shisha tobacco through the Port of Felixstowe has been given a suspended sentence.

Yesterday, 21:42

A Suffolk village is to host its annual garage sale to benefit good causes both at home and abroad.

Show Job Lists

Local weather

Overcast

Overcast

max temp: 7°C

min temp: 4°C

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter
MyDate24 MyPhotos24