Babergh Council name change decision pushed back to allow councillors “more time” to consider it
PUBLISHED: 16:30 14 October 2019 | UPDATED: 16:58 14 October 2019
Controversial proposals to rename Babergh District Council in Suffolk because people couldn’t say its name have been kicked into the long grass just a week before councillors were to decide on it.
Divisive proposals to rename a Suffolk council because people couldn't say its name have been kicked into the long grass just a week before councillors were to decide on it.
Babergh District Council, pronounced "Bay-ber", was due to discuss a potential name change to South Suffolk Council at a special meeting on Tuesday next week.
But the council's leaders have opted to cancel the meeting and push back the debate to give councillors more time to consider it.
According to the authority, any name change is unlikely before 2021 - more than 18 months after it was due to be discussed.
A firm date for the matter to return has not been given, and may not surface again until after the next elections in 2023.
Independent councillor Clive Arthey, deputy leader, said: "We recognise that there's a lot to consider and want to provide more time for all councillors to fully consider the potential benefits, implications and costs before meeting to reach any decision."
You may also want to watch:
"Part of the rationale for the proposed name change was to help raise awareness and investment in the area - with people from further afield unaware of where Babergh is and what it has to offer."
The matter made waves nationally, where the pronunciation of the authority became a talking point.
The council has been in existence since 1974 but the Babergh name first featured in the Domesday Book in 1086 as "baberga" - believed to refer to a hill owned by a man called Babba.
According to the council, a name change can only be made if two thirds of the council pass a resolution at a specially convened meeting.
Conservative council leader John Ward said: "We have received valuable feedback both for and against the proposals over recent weeks that will help in our future discussions and we are extremely grateful for the free publicity we have received in the meantime, both nationally and internationally, that has helped people understand exactly where Babergh is located, and how to pronounce it!"
Green group leader Robert Lindsay said: "It's John Ward's idea and I have got some sympathy with it, but he needs to get a two thirds majority to get it through.
"We had a meeting of all the group leaders and it's quite clear that a majority isn't there at the moment.
"I am pleased we are not considering it because there are far more urgent things that need to be done, like the climate emergency, that are worth spending money on."
If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Sudbury Mercury. Click the link in the yellow box below for details.